Who Made This Mess? Lawsuit Filed & Pet Food Recall Goes Global

Photo by Sobakovod

Recall Update (May 30, 6:30 p.m. Eastern): FDA spokeswoman Laura Alvey stated Tuesday, that Salmonella contamination found at Diamond’s Meta, Missouri plant is not from the same strain as that of the Gaston, South Carolina plant. The contamination at the Missouri plant comes from Salmonella Liverpool, while the South Carolina plant — connected to all products except those in the most recent recall expansion — has been contaminated by Salmonella Infantis.

The Missouri plant has now been included in the FDA’s ongoing investigation into the  Salmonella outbreak and recall.  Diamond also has a facility in Lathrop, California which is not included in the plants producing contaminated food, at this time.

Pets are rarely tested for Salmonella, making it impossible to estimate the number ill from the contamination.  On May 29, 2012 Law.com reports a lawsuit was filed alleging an infant got Salmonella-tainted dog food making it the first case in the wake of a series of messy pet food recall expansions and corrections.

After expanding the recall at least eight times, writers are frustrated by the coverage and confusion.  The Diamond recall missteps include corrections to use by dates and production codes.  The company seems to make and the correct and expand the slip ups, as documented in correction notices on the Diamond website where the best before date first changed to December 2012 through April 7, 2012.

Later changes in code and dates were corrected to “The below list of product with production codes that must have both a number “3” in the 9th position AND an “X” in the 10th or 11th position with best before dates of December 9, 2012, through January 31, 2013 which are being recalled.”
“Please note:  we have CORRECTED the production codes below.”  The original announcement of recall of Chicken Soup dog food required yet another change in the production codes.

Microbiologist and eFoodAlert writer, Phyllis Entis has established that pet owners in Ireland and France have reported their dogs became sick after eating Taste of the Wild, one of the recalled brands.

On May 21, the public health arm of the Singapore government released a consumer advisory on the recall. Four of the nine affected brands are sold in Singapore.

On the day of the most recent recall expansion, the Calgary Herald in Alberta reported that two cats in a Montreal animal shelter died after eating recalled cat food. Around that same time, another human case was reported in Nova Scotia, bringing the confirmed human cases to 17: 15 in the U.S. and 2 in Canada.

“This stuff is all around the world,” Entis said. “There are a lot of countries where this product might be, but Diamond — to the best of my knowledge — has not released a list of countries.”

Related Posts: Tips to Keep Your Pet Safe During Recalls; How to Choose a New Food for Your Pet; Do You Really Know What’s In Your Pet Food?; Public Service Announcement from Veterinarian, Dr. Sarah

2 thoughts on “Who Made This Mess? Lawsuit Filed & Pet Food Recall Goes Global

  1. Pingback: Three Times, You’re Out! | Fifi and Fido

  2. Pingback: Yes, Dogs & Cats Get Salmonella Poisoning: Vet Safety Tips For Pet Food Recall | Fifi and Fido